Ranking methodology
We scored six services on the five factors that decide whether a creator stays protected month after month. This is "best content protection for creators," not "fastest one-off takedown," so the weights lean toward ongoing monitoring and coverage. Leaked content rarely stays in one place. Industry write-ups, including Ceartas's own blog (blog.ceartas.io), describe creator leaks as a recurring problem that resurfaces across search, social, and file hosts, which is the case for treating protection as a subscription to a problem, not a one-time fix.
| Factor | Weight | What we measured |
|---|---|---|
| Ongoing monitoring + coverage breadth | 30% | Does it keep scanning across search, social, Telegram, and deep-web hosts, and re-check for reuploads, or does it only act on links you submit? |
| Removal effectiveness + escalation | 20% | What happens after the first notice: host, CDN, payment processor, search de-listing, manual, re-filing when content reappears? |
| Verifiable results | 20% | Can the removal numbers be confirmed outside the vendor's own dashboard, for example in Google's public Transparency Report? |
| Privacy / identity protection | 15% | Is the notice filed under the service's name so your real identity stays off public records? |
| Free scan + price / seat transparency | 15% | Can you see real leaks before paying, with no card or ID, and does pricing scale sanely across multiple handles or an agency roster? |
Data sources and limitations
Data sources (June 2026):
- Our own free-scan tests, run against each service where a no-card scan was available, comparing leak counts on the same creator handle.
- Each provider's public pricing and feature pages, read June 2026 (these change often, so we date everything).
- Google's public Transparency Report (transparencyreport.google.com/copyright) for any search-removal claim that can be checked independently.
- Published category write-ups from the competitors' own blogs (Ceartas, Rulta) for market context, quoted and linked rather than restated as our own fact.
Limitations (read this). We can't run a competitor's internal software, so we did not score private dashboards or self-reported success rates we couldn't verify. Where a provider publishes a number with no independent source, we flag it as self-reported instead of treating it as fact. If a feature changed after June 2026, the provider's current site wins over this page. We re-score this ranking as the field moves.
On our own bias
We built Fanlock and we put it first. Read that the way you'd read any company ranking itself, with a raised eyebrow. The honest check is the free scan: run your handle through us and through anyone else, then compare what each one actually finds. That number isn't ours to spin.
The ranking at a glance
| # | Service | Best for | Continuous monitoring | Coverage breadth | Telegram turnaround | Google/search depth | Verifiable removals | Free scan, no card | From |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fanlock | Always-on protection for creators and agencies | Yes, re-files on reappearance | Search + social + Telegram + deep-web | ~7 days (scans public + invite-only itself) | Pirate-Intent Search, millions of leak sites; 97.5% removal (Transparency Report) | Yes (Transparency Report) | Yes | $49/mo |
| 2 | Rulta | Face-search monitoring | Yes (per Rulta) | Search + social; Telegram on Legend tier | ~25 days, up to ~3 mo (Rulta states) | 200M+ sites, 50+ bots (Rulta's own figure) | 77.8% claimed; verify in Transparency Report | No (3-day trial, card) | $109/mo |
| 3 | Ceartas / Midnight Labs | Creators scaling toward enterprise | Yes, 24/7 (Ceartas states) | Search; +Bing/Yahoo & Telegram on VIP+ | Not published (VIP+ only; "detect in ~60 min" claim) | 75M+ sites (Ceartas's own figure) | 94% claimed; verify in Transparency Report | No | $69/mo |
| 4 | Onsist | Brands and broad web piracy | Yes (Onsist states) | Google + Bing + Yahoo; broad web; Telegram | Offered, not published | Google + Bing + Yahoo all plans | 90% claimed; verify in Transparency Report | Verify on site | $199/mo (per keyword) |
| 5 | BrandItScan | Badge and affiliate program | Yes (BrandItScan states) | Search + social; Telegram (disputed) | 24–72h (their claim; disputed) | 72,000+ sites/hr (their claim); delist ~2h | Self-reported | Yes (7-day trial) | $69/mo |
| 6 | Erase | Reputation and content removal | Verify on their site | Verify on their site | Verify on their site | Verify on their site | Self-reported | Verify on their site | Verify on their site |
The services, scored
1. Fanlock — best for always-on protection across platforms
We built Fanlock after our own work got stolen, so it's designed to keep watching, not just to fire one notice. It scans Google, Bing, and Yahoo, the major social platforms (Instagram, Facebook, Threads, TikTok, X, Reddit), Telegram including invite-only channels, and deep-web piracy hosts and file lockers. When something comes down and gets reposted, it re-files. Removals run a four-tier escalation past the first notice: automated DMCA, then host, registrar, and payment processor, then search de-listing, then white-glove manual removal. Notices are filed under Fanlock's name, so your legal identity stays off the public record, and you can tie unlimited stage names to one account, which is why agencies use it to cover a whole roster from one place.
- Best for: creators who need protection that runs continuously across NSFW and SFW platforms, and agencies covering multiple performers under one account.
- What to consider: we're focused on the creator economy, not general brand or corporate piracy, and we're the newest company on this list (launched February 2026), so we have less tenure than the incumbents. The flip side of new is that our numbers are checkable. The Google side of our 97.5% removal rate shows up in Google's public Transparency Report, we've pulled 250,000+ posts from Google, deleted 75,000+ files from host sites, and scanned 4M+ websites, and Telegram leaks come down in about 7 days on average.
From $49/mo. Free scan first, with no card and no selfie until you've seen your results. Rated "Excellent" 4.3 stars on Trustpilot.
2. Rulta — established, face-search positioning
A longer-running name, marketed around reverse face-search (which it offers from the Premier tier) and a large library of educational content. Pricing runs Pro $109, Premier $144, and Legend $324 a month, with extra usernames adding $45 to $75 depending on plan, and the trial is three days with a card required. Telegram monitoring sits on the Legend tier only and is link-driven, so you find and submit the links yourself. Rulta files within 24 hours, but Telegram's own response is the slow part: Rulta states typical Telegram removals take about 25 days and can run up to roughly three months (rulta.com/telegram-dmca). On search, Ceartas's blog reports Rulta scans more than 200 million websites with 50+ bots (Rulta's own figure) and cites a 77.8% Google removal rate. Like any filer, Rulta's Google removal record is public in Google's Transparency Report, so you can check that number yourself (blog.ceartas.io).
- Best for: creators who want face-search built into their monitoring.
- What to consider: Telegram is link-driven and Legend-tier only, so if locked-channel leaks are your main problem you're doing the finding yourself and waiting on Telegram's roughly 25-day timeline. Extra usernames are billed per handle, so do that math before committing a roster.
3. Ceartas / Midnight Labs — creator service moving toward enterprise
Ceartas runs a creator brand alongside an enterprise brand on the same platform, with strong PR and a steady stream of platform-specific DMCA how-tos on its blog (blog.ceartas.io). The company rebranded its enterprise side as Midnight Labs and has been leaning into larger accounts. Plans run Star $69, Elite $169, VIP $349, and Platinum $1,200 a month, with 50% off the first month and no free scan. Google removal is included on every tier, but Bing and Yahoo de-indexing, Telegram monitoring, and deepfake removal are gated to the VIP and Platinum tiers. Ceartas describes its Telegram work as direct-link monitoring plus platform partnerships and claims detection in about 60 minutes, but it publishes no firm removal turnaround. On search, Ceartas reports monitoring 75 million-plus websites 24/7 (its own figure) and a 94% success rate. Like any filer, its Google removal record is public in Google's Transparency Report, so you can check it there.
- Best for: creators who expect to scale and like the idea of a vendor with an enterprise tier.
- What to consider: Telegram, Bing, and Yahoo only unlock on the $349-and-up VIP and Platinum tiers, and there's no free scan, so you're paying before you see what it finds. If you're an individual creator, check the creator plan still gets first-class attention as the company's focus shifts upmarket.
4. Onsist — best for brands and broad web piracy
Mature, wide web-takedown coverage that reaches well past creators into brand protection, music, and gaming. Onsist has run since 2010 out of the Netherlands, and if your problem is general piracy across the open web, this breadth is a real strength. Pricing is per keyword, not per seat: Lite $199 for one keyword, Full $249 for twenty, and Advanced $399 for fifty, with a 20% annual discount and unlimited takedowns. Google, Bing, and Yahoo de-indexing is included on every plan. Onsist reports a 90% average removal rate across more than 700 brands; like any filer, its Google removal record is public in Google's Transparency Report, so you can check it there. It does offer Telegram removal (onsist.com/blog/telegram-piracy), but it doesn't publish a turnaround time or say whether invite-only channels are covered.
- Best for: brands and SFW creators whose exposure is broad web piracy more than locked-channel leaks.
- What to consider: the per-keyword model means cost climbs with the number of names you track rather than scaling per creator seat, so weigh that as a solo creator or an agency. Telegram is offered, but the turnaround and invite-only depth aren't published.
5. BrandItScan — badge and affiliate-driven
Known for a "protected by" badge and a 10% lifetime affiliate program, which is part of why it shows up so widely in creator circles. Pricing is Premium $69 a month for three stage names (plus $5 a month for each extra) and White Glove $149 a month for unlimited names, with a free scan and a 7-day trial that needs no card. BrandItScan says it monitors Telegram channels and that most content comes down within 24 to 72 hours (branditscan.com); worth flagging that Ceartas's blog claims BrandItScan discloses no Telegram-specific monitoring, so treat both as competing claims rather than settled fact. On search, BrandItScan says it scans 72,000-plus websites hourly and that Google links are delisted in about two hours with full processing in one to three business days (per its support docs). All of these are the company's own numbers.
- Best for: creators who want a visible badge and are comfortable with a referral-driven product.
- What to consider: its Telegram coverage is disputed between BrandItScan's own claim and Ceartas's, and the speed and scan figures are self-reported, so lean on the free scan to see actual results on your handle.
6. Erase — reputation and content removal
A newer entrant positioned around content removal and online reputation cleanup. Worth a look if your concern extends past leaks into search-result and reputation management.
- Best for: creators who want removal bundled with broader reputation work.
- What to consider: confirm on their site whether creator content monitoring is continuous, whether Telegram and deep-web hosts are covered, and what's included versus an add-on. Verify pricing for multiple handles.
Specialty rankings
- Best for ongoing Telegram and deep-web monitoring: Fanlock. It scans Telegram itself, public and invite-only channels, plus the file hosts where leaks actually pool, and it keeps re-checking. For most adult creators this is the part that decides everything, because a service that only watches Google misses where the content really lives. Average Telegram removal runs about 7 days. For comparison, Rulta states its Telegram removals typically take about 25 days and gates them to its top Legend tier, Ceartas offers Telegram only on its VIP and Platinum plans with no published turnaround, and Onsist offers Telegram removal without publishing a timeline.
- Best for agencies and multi-creator rosters: Fanlock. Unlimited stage names tie to one account, notices file under Fanlock's name so no performer's real identity is exposed, and one dashboard covers the whole roster. If you manage several creators, the question is whether the price and the protection scale together. Run a few of your handles through a free scan and see the coverage before you commit a roster.
- Best for general brand and broad web piracy: Onsist. If your exposure is wide open-web piracy beyond the creator platforms, its breadth and per-keyword model (Lite $199 / Full $249 / Advanced $399) fit that shape better than a per-seat creator tool. It does offer Telegram removal, but the turnaround and invite-only depth aren't published, so weigh that if locked channels are part of your problem.
FAQ
What is the best content protection for creators?
It depends on where your content gets leaked and whether you need protection once or continuously. For most paid creators the leaks resurface for months across Telegram, file hosts, and search, so the best fit is a service that monitors all of those without stopping, escalates past the first notice, and lets you verify removals. Score services on the five factors in our methodology, then run a free scan on two and compare what they actually find on your handle.
What is the best content removal service if I only care about taking things down fast?
Speed matters, but a removal that comes down and reposts a week later isn't protection. Look at what happens after the first notice: does the service escalate to the host, the payment processor, and search de-listing, and does it re-file automatically when content reappears? Fanlock runs a four-tier escalation and re-files on reappearance, with Telegram removals averaging about 7 days. The first takedown is the easy part. Keeping it down is the job.
Do SFW creators need content protection too?
Yes. Stolen photos, ripped video courses, reposted paid streams, and impersonation accounts hit SFW creators as much as adult ones. The platforms differ, the mechanism is the same: your paid work gets copied and redistributed. A protection service that covers search, social, and file hosts works for both. The difference is mostly which platforms you weight most heavily.
How is ongoing content protection different from a one-time takedown?
A one-time takedown removes the copies that exist today. Ongoing protection keeps scanning for the copies that show up tomorrow, then files on those too. Because leaked files get re-uploaded constantly, a single notice solves the moment and not the problem. That's why protection is sold as a subscription. You're paying for the monitoring that catches the next wave, not just the first one.
Can one service protect multiple creators or a whole agency roster?
Yes, and it's worth asking how pricing scales before you sign. Fanlock ties unlimited stage names to one account and files everything under its own name, so an agency can cover a full roster from a single dashboard without exposing anyone's legal identity. If you manage several creators, run a handful of their handles through a free scan first and confirm the coverage and the per-seat math hold up.
Let Fanlock do it for you, automatically
Sign up and Fanlock finds and removes your leaked content across search, social, Telegram, and piracy sites, files every takedown under our name to protect your identity, and re-files when it reappears. Our Google removals run about 97.5%, verifiable in Google's public Transparency Report.
The best test isn't our table, it's your scan
Give us a username, see every leak we find right now, and score us against anyone else on the five factors above. No credit card, no ID until you've seen what we found.
About Zander Small
co-founder of Fanlock
Zander Small is a co-founder of Fanlock and the engineer who built its detection and takedown system. He's a creator himself, with a following of around 2 million, and started Fanlock after seeing how hard it is for creators to get stolen content removed and keep it down. He writes about how DMCA enforcement actually works in practice, across search, social, Telegram, and piracy sites. More about the Fanlock team →