Onsist vs Rulta: current plans and coverage

Onsist’s adult-protection plans use keyword allowances rather than an interchangeable number of creator seats. Published monthly prices add VAT. Telegram protection is advertised, but exact plan scope and expected response should be confirmed for your case.

List your known leak locations, stage names and authorized accounts before comparing plans. Ask how each provider reviews a match, accepts corrections and follows up when a recipient does not remove the material.

Rulta publishes one, two or four included usernames depending on the plan, plus additional username fees. Its verification process offers several methods; a selfie is not the only option. Telegram is listed on Legend, with conflicting descriptions of automatic monitoring and user-submitted links.

The published plans list Google, Bing and Yahoo. Keywords are the billing unit shown, so a keyword allowance should not be presented as an equivalent number of creator seats. Its advertised average removal percentage does not establish a Google-only result or a comparable customer cohort.

Ask for current trial/demo terms. Keyword-based plans; confirm creator accounts and client-report requirements.

Pricing and terms · Coverage · Agency information

Rulta’s verification help lists a selfie alongside social-account methods and an ID option. The Telegram page has conflicting monitoring descriptions: its headline advertises automation, while the FAQ documents submitted links and says automatic scanning is unavailable. Confirm that workflow directly. Its timing estimates describe its own service; they are not a controlled comparison with Fanlock.

Verification has several methods; inspected help material describes a paid trial. Documents multiple creators under one account, with verification for each creator.

Pricing and terms · Coverage · Agency information

Basic covers Google and website removals. Pro adds Bing/Yahoo delisting and social takedowns; Max adds Telegram takedowns. The free scan lets you inspect potential matches. Review the included platforms and authorization steps before starting paid removal. We publish this guide and have a commercial interest in Fanlock.

Free scan and detection results; paid removal depends on the selected plan. Roster management and creator-level results; confirm the report and roster scope for your account.

Pricing and terms · Coverage · Agency information

Ask for the full recurring price, billing unit, included platforms and limits on submitted links. A monitored name is not necessarily a separate creator seat. Confirm taxes and any annual commitment at checkout.

For Telegram, distinguish monitoring accessible content, accepting links, filing requests and confirming message or channel removal. Provider pages that conflict or omit a feature do not establish a reliable yes/no answer.

For an agency, request a sample client report and confirm authorization for each creator. Inspect pending requests and duplicate handling alongside the claimed removals. Ask what happens to access and reports when a creator leaves.

We checked the linked provider pages on September 13, 2026. These are advertised capabilities and regular monthly USD terms, not independent measurements of software quality, scan recall or takedown speed. We did not run paid trials for this review.

Fanlock publishes this article and has a commercial interest in its own service. Google Search reporting concerns delisting requests, not total source or Telegram removals. We do not use unlike reporter percentages or unsupported weighted scores to rank these services.

Review the plan details and practical reporting guides.

• Fanlock plan coverage
• OnlyFans leak removal service
• Agency service comparison
• Removal evidence definitions