The short answer
Rulta and Bruqi are both DMCA takedown services for creators. The clearest public difference is how they price. Rulta tiers its plans by the number of stage names you protect, while Bruqi includes unlimited usernames on every plan. They also differ on Telegram and scan frequency. The right pick depends on where your leaks actually live.
How to compare them (the criteria that matter)
Score any takedown service, these two included, on the same five factors. Don't weigh a feature list, weigh what removes your leaks.
- Telegram coverage — does it scan Telegram itself, or only act on links you hand it? And is Telegram gated behind the top tier?
- Pricing model — does cost scale with the number of stage names, or are all your usernames included? Aliases matter, because more handles usually means more leaks found.
- Escalation — what happens after the first notice (host, CDN, payment processor, search de-listing, manual removal), and does it re-file when content reappears?
- Verifiable results — can you confirm the removal rate outside their own dashboard?
- Free scan and scan frequency — can you see real leaks before paying, and how often does it re-scan once you're in?
Rulta vs Bruqi at a glance
| Rulta | Bruqi | |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning | DMCA takedown service, reverse-image / AI search focus | AI-powered DMCA removal, multi-method scanning |
| Pricing model | Tiered by stage names (1 / 2 / 4 across plans) | Unlimited usernames on every tier |
| Public plans | Pro $109, Premier $144, Legend $324 (rulta.com/pricing); extra usernames $45–$75/mo by plan; 3-day trial (card required) | DIY free, Starter $29, Creator Pro $99, Top 1% $249 (bruqi.com/pricing) |
| Telegram takedown | Legend (top) tier only; link-driven (you submit URLs) | Listed on Creator Pro and up, alongside X and Reddit; doesn't specify channel scanning vs submitted links |
| Search de-listing | Google search + images | Google on all tiers; Bing from Creator Pro up |
| Reverse / AI image search | AI and face search from Premier (mid tier) up | Impersonator detection from Creator Pro; deepfake removal on Top 1% |
| Free scan | 3-day free trial (payment details required) | Free DIY account (scans only) |
| Scan cadence | 10 / 20 / unlimited requests per day (Pro / Premier / Legend) | Weekly / daily / hourly by tier |
Plans and features above come from each company's own pricing and FAQ pages and can change. We don't run either company's software, so we won't assert what their dashboards do behind the login. Confirm any cell that's still hedged, or test both directly (Bruqi's free DIY scan, Rulta's 3-day trial) and compare leak counts. Rulta pricing per rulta.com/pricing; Bruqi pricing per bruqi.com/pricing.
Where each tends to fit
- Lean Rulta if reverse-image / face search is your priority and you protect one or two stage names. Check which tier unlocks what before you buy: AI and face search start on Premier (the mid plan), and Telegram is Legend-only, their top plan (rulta.com/pricing).
- Lean Bruqi if you use a lot of aliases and want them all covered without paying per name, and weekly-to-hourly scan frequency fits your risk. Bruqi's pricing page now lists Telegram on Creator Pro and up, but doesn't say whether it scans channels or only acts on links you submit, so confirm the scope for your case (bruqi.com/pricing).
A quick note on why the alias question matters. Bruqi makes the point that adding every handle you've used tends to surface more leaks, not fewer (bruqi.com). That's worth weighing against any model that caps how many names a plan protects.
A third option to weigh: Fanlock
We built Fanlock because the gap we kept hitting was Telegram. For a lot of adult creators, most leaks don't live on Google or tube sites, they live in Telegram channels. Ceartas, a competitor, puts the stakes plainly in its own write-up: a single PPV reposted to a 50,000-member Telegram channel, with creators losing roughly $3,000 to $8,000 a month in subscriber revenue, and Telegram's closed ecosystem named as one of the hardest places to enforce against (per Ceartas's content-protection guide). That's their published claim, not ours, but it matches what we see.
So here's where Fanlock lands against the five criteria. We scan Telegram itself, both public and invite-only channels, not just links you submit, and it isn't gated behind a top tier. Unlimited usernames and stage names tie to one creator, so aliases don't cost extra. We escalate across four tiers, from automated notices to host, registrar, and payment processor, then search de-listing, then white-glove manual removal, and we re-file when content reappears. Notices are filed under Fanlock's name, so your real identity stays off public records. Our Google removals run about 97.5%, which you can confirm yourself in Google's public Transparency Report rather than trusting a dashboard. Telegram leaks come down in about 7 days. Plans start at $49/mo, and the first scan is free with no card.
The honest test still holds: run the same username through all three free scans and compare what each one actually finds.
FAQ
Is Rulta or Bruqi better for OnlyFans creators?
It depends on how many stage names you protect and where your leaks are. Bruqi includes unlimited usernames on every plan, while Rulta tiers by the number of names, so the math changes if you use a lot of aliases. Neither is automatically "best." Score them on the five criteria above and run a free scan on each first.
What's the main difference between Rulta and Bruqi?
On their public pages, the clearest difference is pricing model. Rulta scales plans by stage names (one, two, then four), and Bruqi includes unlimited usernames at every tier. They also differ on scan cadence and on which tier covers Telegram. Verify current details on each site, since both change.
Does Rulta or Bruqi cover Telegram?
Rulta lists Telegram takedown on its top (Legend) plan only (rulta.com/pricing). Bruqi's pricing page now lists Telegram on its Creator Pro tier and up, alongside X and Reddit, though it doesn't say whether it scans Telegram channels or only acts on links you submit (bruqi.com/pricing). Confirm both on their current sites, especially if most of your leaks live in Telegram channels.
How do I compare DMCA services without the marketing spin?
Use a fixed rubric: Telegram coverage, pricing model, escalation past the first notice, verifiable removals, and a free scan. Score every service the same way and check the one number you can audit from the outside, which is the Google removal rate in Google's Transparency Report.
Is there a cheaper alternative to Rulta and Bruqi?
There are several creator-focused services at different price points. Bruqi starts free and at $29/mo, and Fanlock starts at $49/mo. Price matters less than how many real leaks a service surfaces, which a free scan shows you before you pay anything.
Switch to Fanlock
If you're weighing Rulta or Bruqi, weigh us too. Sign up and Fanlock removes your content from leak sites, search, social, and Telegram automatically, files every notice under our name so your identity stays private, and re-files when leaks return. Our Pirate-Intent Search runs the Google queries a buyer or re-uploader would type to find you, so reposts get caught as they surface rather than waiting on the next scheduled scan. Our Google removals run about 97.5%, verifiable in Google's public Transparency Report.
Don't pick from a table, pick from a scan
Run the same username through each service's free scan and compare what they find. Start with ours. No card, no ID until you've seen the leaks.
About Zander Small
co-founder of Fanlock
Zander Small is a co-founder of Fanlock and the engineer who built its detection and takedown system. He's a creator himself, with a following of around 2 million, and started Fanlock after seeing how hard it is for creators to get stolen content removed and keep it down. He writes about how DMCA enforcement actually works in practice, across search, social, Telegram, and piracy sites. More about the Fanlock team →