Ranking methodology
We scored 5 services on the five factors that decide whether a DMCA tool works at agency scale. These are deliberately different from our creator ranking. A solo creator cares most about Telegram coverage and removal speed. An agency cares about those too, but the thing that breaks at scale is operations: adding and removing talent, paying per seat, seeing every creator in one place, proving the work to clients, and having a human to call. Weights reflect that.
| Factor | Weight | What we measured |
|---|---|---|
| Roster management at scale | 25% | Can one account hold many creators, with unlimited stage names per creator, and can you add or remove talent without a new contract each time? |
| Per-seat economics | 20% | Does price scale cleanly per creator/seat, or per domain and per add-on in a way that gets expensive as the roster grows? |
| Unified dashboard | 20% | One login that shows every creator's leaks and removals, or separate logins and separate exports stitched together by hand? |
| White-label client reporting | 20% | Can you pull a branded removal report to show a client or talent what you took down, without exposing the underlying vendor? |
| Account management and support | 15% | Is there a real human on the account for an agency book of business, or only a ticket queue? |
Data sources and limitations
Data sources (June 2026):
- Our own free-scan tests, run against each service where a no-card scan was available, comparing leak counts on the same creator handle.
- Each provider's public pricing, agency, and feature pages, read June 2026. These change, so we date everything and tell you to verify rival specifics on their current site.
- Google's public Transparency Report (transparencyreport.google.com/copyright) for any search-removal claim that can be checked outside a vendor dashboard.
- For category and market figures, we link the source rather than restate it as ours. Ceartas's own blog (blog.ceartas.io) covers the creator-leak category in depth, including how much of it lives on Telegram and re-upload sites, and we point you there instead of inventing a number.
Limitations (read this). We can't run a competitor's internal software, so we did not score private dashboards, internal success rates, or per-seat prices that aren't published. Where a rival's agency feature isn't documented publicly, we wrote "verify on their site" instead of guessing. Self-reported numbers with no independent source are flagged as self-reported, not treated as fact. If a provider ships a new agency feature after June 2026, their current site wins over this page. We re-score as the field moves.
On ranking ourselves first
We put Fanlock at the top, and you should read that with a raised eyebrow, the same way you'd read any vendor ranking its own product. Here's the honest version: we built Fanlock around a roster from the start because Morgpie manages and works with other creators, so the agency case is the one we solved first. The criteria above are the ones we're strong on, which is exactly why we'd pick them. The check on our bias is free and takes a username. Run a scan on one of your creators, run the same handle through anyone else, and compare what comes back. The chart is our opinion. The scan is data.
The ranking at a glance
| # | Service | Pricing model | Unified dashboard | White-label reports | Telegram turnaround | Google/search depth | From |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fanlock | Per seat, unlimited stage names | Yes | Yes | ~7 days, scans Telegram itself | 97.5%, verifiable in Google's Transparency Report | $49/mo per seat |
| 2 | Ceartas / Midnight Labs | Flat tiers (not per-seat) | Verify on site | Verify on site | VIP/Platinum only; no firm time (claims ~60-min detection) | 75M+ sites (claimed); 94% claimed, verify in Transparency Report | $69/mo (Star) |
| 3 | Rulta | Per username | Verify on site | Verify on site | Legend tier only, link-driven (~25 days via Telegram) | ~200M+ sites (claimed); 77.8% claimed, verify in Transparency Report | $109/mo (1 username) |
| 4 | Onsist | Per keyword | Verify on site | Verify on site | Offered; turnaround not published | Google+Bing+Yahoo all plans; 90% claimed, verify in Transparency Report | $199/mo (1 keyword) |
| 5 | BrandItScan | Per stage name | Verify on site | Verify on site | 24–72h (their claim) | 72,000+ sites/hr (their claim) | $69/mo (3 names) |
Competitor pricing, models, and coverage figures were read live in June 2026 and are linked in each entry below; scan counts are the providers' own figures, and each provider's Google removal rate, like any filer's, is public in Google's Transparency Report, so you can check those there rather than take a dashboard number on faith. Agency-specific cells (dashboard, white-label) that rivals don't document publicly are left "verify on their site" rather than guessed.
The services, scored
1. Fanlock — best for agencies running a whole roster
We built Fanlock for rosters because that's the world we live in. One account holds every creator you manage. Each creator can carry unlimited stage names and handles, so the dancer with three platform identities is still one seat, not three. You add talent when you sign them and remove talent when they leave, without renegotiating a contract each time. Notices are filed under Fanlock's name, which does two useful things for an agency: it keeps each creator's real identity off the public record, and it keeps your agency off the paperwork too. Removals run a four-tier escalation past the first notice, host then registrar or payment processor then search de-listing then white-glove manual removal, and we re-file when content reappears. Coverage includes Telegram, public and invite-only channels, where a lot of roster leaks actually circulate.
For the agency-specific stuff: there's a unified dashboard so you see every creator in one view instead of forty logins, and white-label reporting so you can show a client or a piece of talent exactly what came down. On proof, the Google side of our 97.5% removal rate is checkable in Google's public Transparency Report, not just our own dashboard, which means the report you hand a client points at something they can verify independently. Support is hands-on. You're talking to the small team that built and runs the removals, not a ticket number in a queue.
- Best for: agencies and talent managers protecting many creators from one place, especially with Telegram leaks in the mix.
- What to consider: we're focused on the creator economy, not general brand or web piracy, so an agency that also needs broad brand protection across music or gaming should weigh that. We're also the newest company here, launched February 2026, so we have less tenure than the incumbents. Pricing is from $49/mo per seat. Pirate-Intent Search runs on every tier, with wider coverage and faster re-scans as you move up.
2. Ceartas / Midnight Labs — best for agencies wanting an enterprise vendor
Ceartas runs a well-known creator brand and, after rebranding toward Midnight Labs, has leaned into enterprise positioning with notable partnerships and a lot of PR. For an agency that wants a large, recognizable vendor with an enterprise sales motion, it's a natural shortlist entry, and the category content on their blog is genuinely useful background reading (blog.ceartas.io).
- Best for: agencies that want a big-name enterprise vendor and brand recognition behind the contract.
- What to consider: pricing is flat tiers, not per-seat — Star $69 / Elite $169 / VIP $349 / Platinum $1,200 per month, 50% off the first month, no free scan (ceartas.io/pricing). Telegram and deepfake removal are gated to VIP/Platinum, and the lower tiers are Google-only (Bing/Yahoo start at VIP). Ceartas's blog reports monitoring 75M+ sites (its own figure) and a 94% rate; like any filer, its Google removal record is public in Google's Transparency Report, so you can check it there (blog.ceartas.io). As the company leans enterprise, confirm the agency tier still gets attention, and verify whether the dashboard unifies a full roster and whether reports white-label for clients.
3. Rulta — established, face-search positioning
Rulta is a longer-running name often marketed around reverse face-search and a large library of educational content, and it publishes agency-oriented plans. If reverse-image and face-search matter to your roster, it belongs on the list. Rulta's own blog also carries category figures worth a look, and we'd rather link you there than restate their numbers as ours.
- Best for: agencies that put weight on face-search and reverse-image discovery across talent.
- What to consider: pricing is per username, which scales fast across a roster — Pro $109 (1 username) / Premier $144 (2) / Legend $324 (4), extra usernames $45–$75/mo each (rulta.com/pricing). Telegram is Legend-tier only and link-driven (you submit links; Telegram's own removal runs ~25 days, rulta.com/telegram-dmca). Rulta's search depth (~200M+ sites) is its own figure, and its 77.8% Google removal rate, like any filer's, is public in Google's Transparency Report, so you can check it there (figures via Ceartas's blog). Verify whether client-facing reports can be branded as yours.
4. Onsist — best for brands and broad web piracy
Onsist offers mature, broad web-takedown coverage that goes well beyond creators into brand protection, music, and gaming. If part of your agency's job is general piracy and not only platform leaks, that breadth is a real strength.
- Best for: agencies whose problem extends into broad web piracy and brand protection, not just creator-platform leaks.
- What to consider: pricing is per keyword, not per creator-seat — Lite $199 (1 keyword) / Full $249 (up to 20) / Advanced $399 (up to 50), 20% off annual (onsist.com). Model what your roster actually costs in keywords before committing. Google + Bing + Yahoo de-indexing is on all plans with a 90% rate across 700+ brands; like any filer, Onsist's Google removal record is public in Google's Transparency Report, so you can check it there. Telegram removal is offered but turnaround and invite-only depth aren't published. Verify whether one dashboard covers your whole roster.
5. BrandItScan — badge and affiliate-driven
BrandItScan is known for a "protected by" badge and a creator affiliate program, which is part of why you see it referenced widely. For agencies, the badge can be a visible signal to talent that protection is in place.
- Best for: agencies that want a visible protection badge or an affiliate angle for their creators.
- What to consider: pricing is per stage name — Premium $69/mo (3 stage names, +$5/mo each extra) / White Glove $149/mo (unlimited), free scan + 7-day trial (branditscan.com/pricing). BrandItScan states it removes Telegram content in 24–72h and scans 72,000+ sites hourly; treat those as its own claims (Ceartas's blog says it discloses no Telegram-specific monitoring), and verify any removal claim against something public. Confirm directly whether there's a true multi-creator dashboard and white-label reporting for clients.
Specialty rankings for agencies
- Best for large rosters: Fanlock. One account, unlimited creators, unlimited stage names per creator, and add or remove talent as your book changes. When you're past a handful of creators, the operations layer matters more than any single feature, because forty separate logins is its own full-time job.
- Best for white-label client reporting: Fanlock, because you can pull a branded removal report and the Google portion of the numbers in it is verifiable in Google's public Transparency Report. When you're proving value to a client or a piece of talent, a report that points at something they can check themselves carries more weight than a screenshot of an internal dashboard. For any other service, ask to see a sample branded report before you sign.
- Best per-seat economics: weigh this carefully, because the pricing model decides the math. A per-seat plan scales predictably as you sign talent. A per-domain or add-on-heavy model can get expensive fast across a roster. Fanlock is per seat from $49/mo. For the others, get the per-seat number in writing and run it against your roster size, not a single-creator price.
FAQ
What's the best DMCA service for an OnlyFans agency?
The one that fits how an agency operates, not just how well it files a single notice. Score services on roster management, per-seat pricing, a unified dashboard, white-label reporting, and real account support, then add removal effectiveness and Telegram coverage on top. Fanlock was built around a roster from the start: one account, unlimited creators, unlimited stage names per creator, per-seat pricing from $49/mo, and removals you can verify in Google's Transparency Report. Run a free scan on one of your creators and compare it against anyone else before you decide.
How does per-seat DMCA pricing work for agencies?
Per-seat means you pay for each creator you protect, so cost scales with your roster in a way you can predict. Watch for two traps. Some services price per domain instead of per creator, which gets expensive when a creator has work scattered across many sites. Others charge extra per stage name or per platform, so a creator with three handles costs three times as much. Fanlock counts unlimited stage names under one creator as a single seat, from $49/mo per seat. With any other vendor, get the per-seat number in writing and model it against your actual roster.
Can one dashboard manage takedowns for a whole roster?
With Fanlock, yes. You see every creator and their removals in one login instead of juggling a separate account per person. This is the part that quietly breaks at scale, because manually stitching together forty exports each month is where agency hours disappear. If you're evaluating another service, ask to see the multi-creator view live before you commit, and verify it's a true unified dashboard rather than separate accounts under one invoice.
Do DMCA services offer white-label reports I can send to my talent?
Some do, some don't, and the quality varies. Fanlock gives you white-label reporting so you can show a client or a creator what came down under your own brand, and the Google removal numbers in it are checkable in Google's public Transparency Report. That independent check matters when you're proving your value. For other vendors, ask for a sample branded report up front, and confirm whether the figures in it can be verified outside their dashboard.
Is it cheaper for an agency to buy one service for the whole roster or let each creator buy their own?
Buying centrally almost always wins on both cost and control. One account means per-seat pricing, one dashboard, one report format, and one point of contact, instead of each creator on a different plan with different coverage you can't see into. It also keeps the agency in control of the removal record rather than depending on each creator to manage their own. Fanlock is built for exactly this, from $49/mo per seat with unlimited stage names per creator.
Let Fanlock do it for you, automatically
Sign up and Fanlock finds and removes your leaked content across search, social, Telegram, and piracy sites, files every takedown under our name to protect your identity, and re-files when it reappears. Our Google removals run about 97.5%, verifiable in Google's public Transparency Report.
The best comparison isn't our chart, it's your roster
Book a roster demo and we'll walk your whole book through the dashboard, the per-seat pricing, and a sample white-label report. Or start smaller: run a free scan on one of your creators, see every leak we find right now, and score us against anyone else on the five factors above. No credit card, no ID until you've seen what we found.
About Zander Small
co-founder of Fanlock
Zander Small is a co-founder of Fanlock and the engineer who built its detection and takedown system. He's a creator himself, with a following of around 2 million, and started Fanlock after seeing how hard it is for creators to get stolen content removed and keep it down. He writes about how DMCA enforcement actually works in practice, across search, social, Telegram, and piracy sites. More about the Fanlock team →