The short answer
The quickest way to separate Rulta and Ceartas is to look at how each one prices and who it's now built for. Rulta publishes per-username creator tiers. Ceartas markets fast removals and has pushed upmarket with an enterprise arm, Midnight Labs. Which fits you depends on your number of stage names, where your leaks sit, and what you can verify.
How to compare them (a rubric you can reuse)
Don't shop on logos. Score Rulta, Ceartas, and anyone else on the same five questions.
- Pricing model and fit. Is it per-username, per-seat, or quoted? Does the cost stay sane as you add a second or third stage name?
- Where Telegram sits. Is Telegram covered at the tier you'd actually buy, or is it gated behind the top plan or a custom quote?
- What happens after notice one. Past the automated DMCA, does it push to the host, the registrar, the payment processor, search de-listing, then a human? Or does it stop at "we sent the notice"?
- Proof you can check. Can you confirm the removal rate somewhere other than the vendor's own dashboard?
- Privacy of the filing. Is the notice filed under the service's name so your legal name stays off public takedown records?
Rulta vs Ceartas at a glance
| Rulta | Ceartas / Midnight Labs | |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning | Creator DMCA service, per-username tiers | Creator tiers plus an enterprise track (Midnight Labs) |
| Known for | Image and video search, large blog/library; rated "Excellent" (~4.3) on Trustpilot | Fast-removal messaging, deepfake/biometric focus, enterprise push |
| Pricing (per month) | Pro $109 (1 name) / Premier $144 (2) / Legend $324 (4); extra names cost more; 3-day trial (rulta.com/pricing, verify current) | Star $69 / Elite $169 / VIP $349 / Platinum $1,200; 50% off first month (ceartas.io/pricing, verify current) |
| Search engines | Google + image search; social adds at Premier (rulta.com/pricing) | Google only on Star/Elite; +Bing/Yahoo on VIP/Platinum (ceartas.io/pricing) |
| Telegram & deepfake | Telegram on the Legend tier ($324) only (rulta.com/pricing) | Telegram + deepfake on VIP/Platinum ($349+) only (ceartas.io/pricing) |
| Escalation depth | We don't run it, so we won't assert it; verify on their site | We don't run it, so we won't assert it; verify on their site |
| Verifiable removals | Their Google removal record is public in Google's Transparency Report, so you can check it yourself | ~94% (their figure, blog.ceartas.io); verify their Google removal record in Google's Transparency Report |
We don't run either company's software, so we won't assert what their dashboards or escalation actually do. Confirm every "verify" cell on each provider's current site, or run the same free scan on both and compare leak counts.
A note on pricing structure
This is where the two diverge most visibly, and it's public on their own pages. Rulta lists three per-username creator tiers: Pro at $109/mo (one stage name), Premier at $144/mo (two), and Legend at $324/mo (four), with a 3-day trial and extra stage names billed on top (numbers as of June 2026; verify current at rulta.com/pricing). Cost climbs as you add names, and per their published plans Telegram removal lives only on the top Legend tier.
Ceartas posts four flat creator tiers: Star $69, Elite $169, VIP $349, and Platinum $1,200/mo, with 50% off the first month (as of June 2026; verify current at ceartas.io/pricing). Coverage widens as you climb. Google only on Star and Elite, with Bing and Yahoo added on VIP and Platinum, and both Telegram and deepfake removal gated to those same top two tiers. Above the creator tiers sits an enterprise track branded Midnight Labs, quoted directly; that arm has drawn outside investment, publicly reported in June 2026. If you're a solo creator, ask whether the creator tier still gets first-class attention as the company leans into enterprise.
Where each tends to fit
- Lean Rulta if you want published, predictable per-username pricing and you're protecting one or two stage names. Just note Telegram only unlocks on the $324 Legend tier, so price that in if Telegram is your problem, and confirm what "escalation" means past the first notice.
- Lean Ceartas if you're an agency or larger operation that might grow into the Midnight Labs enterprise track. Just know that on the creator side, search beyond Google plus Telegram and deepfake removal all sit on VIP ($349) and Platinum ($1,200), so the cheaper Star ($69) and Elite ($169) tiers are Google-only. Ask exactly how each works on the plan you'd actually pay for.
A third option to weigh: Fanlock
Here's the wrinkle that bugged us enough to build something: for a lot of adult creators, the worst leaks live in Telegram, and that's the exact coverage that tends to sit behind a top tier or a custom quote elsewhere. So we made Telegram a core part of the job, not an upsell. Fanlock scans Telegram itself, public and invite-only channels, with most removals landing in about 7 days. We also tie unlimited stage names to one creator instead of charging per username, escalate across four tiers and re-file when content reappears, and file under our own name so your identity stays off the record. Plans start at $49/mo with a free scan that needs no card. Our Google removals run about 97.5%, which you can confirm in Google's public Transparency Report rather than a dashboard. The fair test: run the same username through all three free scans and compare what each one actually finds.
FAQ
Is Rulta or Ceartas better for OnlyFans creators?
It depends on how many stage names you protect, where your leaks sit, and what you can verify. Rulta posts per-username creator tiers ($109 to $324/mo); Ceartas posts four flat creator tiers ($69 to $1,200/mo) and adds a quoted Midnight Labs enterprise track. Score both on the five questions above and run a free scan on each before you commit.
What's the difference between Rulta and Ceartas pricing?
Rulta publishes per-username tiers (Pro $109, Premier $144, Legend $324/mo), so cost rises as you add stage names. Ceartas posts four flat creator tiers (Star $69, Elite $169, VIP $349, Platinum $1,200/mo) with 50% off the first month, plus a quoted Midnight Labs enterprise track. Pricing changes, so confirm current numbers at rulta.com/pricing and ceartas.io/pricing.
Does Rulta or Ceartas cover Telegram?
Both do, but only on their top tiers. Per Rulta's published plans, Telegram removal sits on the $324 Legend tier. Ceartas gates Telegram removal (and deepfake removal) to its VIP ($349) and Platinum ($1,200) plans per ceartas.io/pricing, so its cheaper Star and Elite tiers don't include it. If Telegram is your main problem, make it the first thing you test with a free scan.
Is there a cheaper alternative to Rulta and Ceartas?
There are several creator-focused services at different price points. Fanlock starts at $49/mo and ties unlimited stage names to one account. Price matters less than how many real leaks a service surfaces, which a free scan shows you before you pay.
How do I compare Rulta vs Ceartas without the marketing spin?
Use a fixed rubric: pricing model, where Telegram sits, escalation past one notice, proof you can verify, and whether the filing protects your name. Run the same username through each free scan and compare leak counts instead of trusting testimonials you can't check.
Switch to Fanlock
If you're weighing Rulta or Ceartas, weigh us too. Sign up and Fanlock removes your content from leak sites, search, social, and Telegram automatically, files every notice under our name so your identity stays private, and re-files when leaks return. Our Pirate-Intent Search hunts Google with the exact phrases leak-hunters use to find your content, then clears what surfaces across millions of leak sites before it spreads. Our Google removals run about 97.5%, verifiable in Google's public Transparency Report.
Let the scan decide, not the logo
Tables and brand names won't tell you who finds your leaks. Run the same username through each service's free scan and compare. Start with ours. No card, no ID until you've seen the leaks.
About Zander Small
co-founder of Fanlock
Zander Small is a co-founder of Fanlock and the engineer who built its detection and takedown system. He's a creator himself, with a following of around 2 million, and started Fanlock after seeing how hard it is for creators to get stolen content removed and keep it down. He writes about how DMCA enforcement actually works in practice, across search, social, Telegram, and piracy sites. More about the Fanlock team →